صنعت لاستیک ایران

صنعت لاستیک ایران

مدلی برای دوسوتوانی سازمانی در هلدینگ‌های چندمنظوره

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
2 استاد گروه مدیریت عملیات و فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
4 استاد گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
دست یافتن به سطح یکسانی از اکتشاف و بهره‌برداری در سازمان آسان نیست، اما می‌توان مدت‌زمان رسیدن به آن را کوتاه‌تر کرد. سازمان‌هایی که اکتشاف را ترجیح می‏دهند و استخراج را کنار می‏گذارند، دچار هزینه‏های آزمایش کردن می‏شوند، بدون اینکه مزایای چندانی از آن به دست آورند. این شرکت‌ها سرشار از ایده‏های ارائه نشده و قابلیت‌های غیرمتمایز هستند. در مقابل، سازمان‌هایی که اکتشاف را کنار می‏گذارند و درگیر استخراج می‏شوند، احتمالاً در دام توازن ثابت می‏افتند، یعنی پیشرفتی نمی‏کنند و فقط بازدهی دارند. ایجاد یک توازن مناسب بین اکتشاف و استخراج فاکتور اصلی در شکوفایی سیستم هر شرکت است. ازاین‌رو هدف این پژوهش طراحی و تبیین مدل دوسوتوانی سازمانی در هلدینگ‌های چندمنظوره بوده است. روش تحقیق این پژوهش آمیخته از نوع اکتشافی است. ابتدا با استفاده از روش دلفی مدل دوسوتوانی سازمانی در هلدینگ‌های چندمنظوره شکل گرفت. بر اساس روش دلفی، 16 مقوله فرعی در قالب 2 مقوله‌ اصلی (اکتشاف و بهره‌برداری) اجزای مدل را تشکیل می‌دهند. سپس با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری مدل اندازه‌گیری اجزای مدل و مدل ساختاری کل مدل در سطح هلدینگ‌های چندمنظوره اعتبارسنجی شد. بر اساس یافته‌های روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری، در سطح هلدینگ‌های چندمنظوره موردبررسی، عامل «اکتشاف» از طریق زیر بعدهای «ارتباطات»، «استراتژی»، «انعطاف‌پذیری»، «توانمندی»، «چشم‌انداز»، «ساختار»، «فرهنگ ‌سازمانی»، «گرایش کارآفرینی» و «مدیریت کاوشگر» و عامل «بهره‌برداری» از طریق زیر بعدهای «استراتژی»، «انطباق»، «توانمندی»، «چشم‌انداز»، «ساختار»، «فرهنگ سازمانی» و «مدیریت»، متغیر مکنون مرتبه‌ی بالاتر «دوسوتوانی سازمانی» را تبیین می‌کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

-          Abernathy, W. J. & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research policy, 14(1), 3-22.
-          Alizadeh, Y. & Jetter, A. J. (2019). Pathways for balancing exploration and exploitation in innovations: A review and expansion of ambidexterity theory. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(05), 1950032.
-          Almahendra, R. & Ambos, B. (2015). Exploration and exploitation: a 20-year review of evolution and reconceptualisation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(01), 1550008.
-          Arregle, J. L. Hitt, M. A. & Mari, I. (2019). A missing link in family firms’ internationalization research: Family structures. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(5), 809-825.
-          Asgandari,Sh.; Hedayati, R., & Mirhosseini, MR. (2022). The effect of leadership styles on organizational ambivalence with the mediating role of job attachment (case study: employees of tax affairs departments in the west of Mazandaran province). Accounting and Management Perspectives, 5(65), 32-50. (In Persian).
-          Baldwin, G. H. (1982). The Delphi technique and the forecasting of specific fringe benefits. Futures, 14(4), 319-325.
-          Baryshnikova, N. Kiriliuk, O. & Klimecka-Tatar, D. (2021). Enterprises’ strategies transformation in the real sector of the economy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Production Engineering Archives, 27.
-          Batra, I. P, P. & Dhir, S. (2022). Organizational ambidexterity from the emerging market perspective: a review and research agenda. Thunderbird International Business Review, 64(5), 559-573.
-          Boumgarden, P. Nickerson, J. & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 587-610.
-          Cabrera, M. K. S. Déniz-Déniz, M. C. & Martín-Santana, J. D. (2015). Family social capital, trust within the TMT, and the establishment of corporate goals related to nonfamily stakeholders. Family Business Review, 28(2), 145-162.
-          Cennamo, C. Berrone, P. Cruz, C. & Gomez–Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family–controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 36(6), 1153-1173.
-          Chakma, R. Paul, J. & Dhir, S. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
-          Clauss, T. Kraus, S. Kallinger, F. L. Bican, P. M. Brem, A. & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 203-213.
-          Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
-          Darby, J. L. Ketchen Jr, D. J. Williams, B. D. & Tokar, T. (2020). The implications of firm‐specific policy risk, policy uncertainty, and industry factors for inventory: A resource dependence perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 56(4), 3-24.
-          Dezi, L. Santoro, G. Gabteni, H. & Pellicelli, A. C. (2018). The role of big data in shaping ambidextrous business process management: Case studies from the service industry. Business Process Management Journal.
-          Dranev, Y. Izosimova, A. & Meissner, D. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: assessment approaches and empirical evidence. Journal of the knowledge economy, 11, 676-691.
-          Engel, C. & Ebel, P. (2019). Data-driven service innovation: a systematic literature review and development of a research agenda.
-          Formenti, E. (2019). Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary change (Doctoral dissertation, Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana).
-          Gaspersz, J. (2007). Compete with creativity. Available at SSRN 983934.
-          Gaytan, F. & Aguilar, E. (1987). Quantitative analysis of Sertoli cells in neonatally oestrogen-treated rats. Reproduction, 79(2), 589-598.
-          Gibson, C. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). Contextual determinants of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
-          Hills, T. T. Todd, P. M. Lazer, D. Redish, A. D. & Couzin, I. D. (2015). Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(1), 46-54.
-          Hougaz, L. (2015). The Role of Values in Family Business. In Entrepreneurs in Family Business Dynasties (pp. 27-37). Springer, Cham.
-          Hovgaard, A. (2005). Innovation in the forest products industry: An analysis of companies in Alaska and Oregon (Vol. 629). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
-          Huang, J. W. & Li, Y. H. (2017). The mediating role of ambidextrous capability in learning orientation and new product performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.
-          Ibrahimpour, m. Moradi, M. and Membini, Y. (2013). The effect of organizational dualism on the performance of manufacturing industries: investigating the role of environmental dynamics. Iranian Management Sciences, 9(36), 76-53. (In Persian).
-          Junni, P. Sarala, R. M. Taras, V. A. S. & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312.
-          Kafid, N. & Rohmatika, A. (2020). Academic social capital and institutional transformation of Islamic higher education in Indonesia. Akademika: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 24(2), 335-352.
-          Kejkav Mofard, A. R. Khalilian Ashkazari, M. M; and Saida Ardakani, S. (2018). A structural model of the effect of brand ambivalence on brand commitment through performance, mental image and brand reputation. Management and Development Process, 32 (1), 113-133. (In Persian).
-          Kendall, M. & Stuart, A. (1977). The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. 1: Distribution theory. London: Griffin.
-          Khaki, Gh. (2012), research method with an approach to thesis writing, Reklam, Shabak 9646394264. (In Persian).
-           Khodadadi, S. Moradi, M. Yakideh, K. (2017). Explaining the effect of organizational dualism on the functional dimensions of the organization in the banking industry (case study: Bank branches of Gilan province). Industrial Management, 10(1), 85-100. (In Persian).
-          Lin, C. C. & Chuang, L. Z. H. (2012). Using fuzzy delphi method and fuzzy AHP for evaluation structure of the appeal of taiwan’s coastal wetlands ecotourism. In Business, Economics, Financial Sciences, and Management (pp. 347-358). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
-          Luecke, R. (2003). Harvard business essentials: managing creativity and innovation. Harvard Business Press.
-          Martini, A. Bosch, J. & Chaudron, M. (2015). Investigating Architectural Technical Debt accumulation and refactoring over time: A multiple-case study. Information and Software Technology, 67, 237-253.
-          Martini, A. Pareto, L. & Bosch, J. (2012, September). Enablers and inhibitors for speed with reuse. In Proceedings of the 16th International Software Product Line Conference-Volume 1 (pp. 116-125).
-          Mathias, B. D. Mckenny, A. F. & Crook, T. R. (2018). Managing the tensions between exploration and exploitation: The role of time. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(3), 316-334.
-          Mousakhani, M. Alvani, S. M. Mahmoodzadeh, E. & Alidadi Talkhestani, Y. (2019). Effective Factors on Ambidextrous Social Capital. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 28(92), 35-64.
-          Muratova, Y. Rigamonti, D. & Wulff, J. (2017). When do acquisitions facilitate technological exploration and exploitation? A replication. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 1, p. 15998). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
-          Naradda Gamage, S. K. Ekanayake, E. M. S. Abeyrathne, G. A. K. N. J. Prasanna, R. P. I. R. Jayasundara, J. M. S. B. & Rajapakshe, P. S. K. (2020). A review of global challenges and survival strategies of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Economies, 8(4), 79.
-          Nazari, Kamran, Vakili, Youssef, Gharin, Hamzah, & Shahriari, Sultanali. (1400). Meta-analysis of the antecedents of organizational ambivalence. Innovation management in defense organizations. (In Persian).
-          Niaz Azari, K. Salehi, M. Khosrabadi, S. (2015). Designing and validating a tool to assess ambidexterity in organizational management, Urban and Rural Management, 44, 199-214. (In Persian).
-          Oduro, S. & De Nisco, A. (2023). From Industry 4.0 adoption to innovation ambidexterity to firm performance: a MASEM analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management.
-          O'Reilly 3rd, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard business review, 82(4), 74.
-          Parida, V. Lahti, T. & Wincent, J. (2016). Exploration and exploitation and firm performance variability: a study of ambidexterity in entrepreneurial firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 1147-1164.
-          Patky, J. (2020). The influence of organizational learning on performance and innovation: a literature review. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(3), 229-242.
-          Peng, M. Y. P. Lin, K. H. Peng, D. L. & Chen, P. (2019). Linking organizational ambidexterity and performance: The drivers of sustainability in high-tech firms. Sustainability, 11(14), 3931.
-          Pertusa-Ortega, E. M. & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2018). A joint analysis of determinants and performance consequences of ambidexterity. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(2), 84-98.
-          Pojani, D. & Stead, D. (2015). Sustainable urban transport in the developing world: beyond megacities. Sustainability, 7(6), 7784-7805.
-          Qammar, R. & Abidin, R. Z. U. (2020). Mediating and Moderating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity and Innovative Climate among Leadership Styles and Employee Performance. Journal of Management Info, 7(1), 1-9.
-          Ragazou, K. Passas, I. Garefalakis, A. & Dimou, I. (2022). Investigating the research trends on strategic ambidexterity, agility, and open innovation in SMEs: Perceptions from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 118.
-          Ramadani, V. Memili, E. Palalić, R. & Chang, E. P. (2020). Strategic Management in the Family Businesses. In Entrepreneurial Family Businesses (pp. 43-53). Springer, Cham.
-          Reeves, M. & Haanaes, K. (2015). Your strategy needs a strategy: How to choose and execute the right approach. Harvard Business Review Press.
-          Riar, F. J. & Kellermanns, F. W. (2021). Family business. In World Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.
-          Ribeiro, O. C. D. R. & Steiner Neto, P. J. (2021). Sustainable competitive advantage and green innovation: a review of joint scale propositions. Gestão & Produção, 28, e5669.
-          Sakhdri, K. Zia, B; and Johrianzadeh, F. (2014). Investigating factors affecting the organizational ambivalence of franchisors. Entrepreneurship Development, 8(4), 648-631. (In Persian).
-          Salehi, F. & Yaghtin, A. (2014). Enterprise factors as ambidexterity antecedents: contingency model for ambidextrous organizations. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 8(2), 49-61.
-          Sarkees, M. & Hulland, J. (2009). Innovation and efficiency: It is possible to have it all. Business horizons, 52(1), 45-55.
-          Sarmad, Z. Bazargan, A; and Hijazi, A. (2013). Research methods in behavioral sciences (26th edition). Tehran: Nash Agh. (In Persian).
-          Sheremata, W. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of management review, 25(2), 389-408.
-          Tabatabaian, H., Pourqasem, M., & Safardoost Markieh, A. (2022). Investigating the relationship between ambidextrous organizational culture and organizational performance: explaining the role of bilateral strategic decisions and orientations. Scientific Journal of Organizational Culture Management», 20(2), 427-452. (In Persian).
-           Tavakoli Gh.; Zamani M., (2021). Determining the position of organizational ambivalence in strategic innovation, management science researches, third year, autumn 2021, number 8(In Persian).
-          Tushman, M. L. & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38(4), 8-29.
-          Úbeda-García, M. Claver-Cortés, E. Marco-Lajara, B. & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. (2020). Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations. Journal of Business Research, 112, 363-372.
-          Urabe, K. (1988). Innovation and the Japanese management system. In K. Urabe, J. Child, & T. Kagono (Eds.), Innovation and management international comparisons.
-          Voss, G. B. & Voss, Z. G. (2013). Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains. Organization Science, 24(5), 1459-1477.
-          Vrontis, D. Thrassou, A. Santoro, G. & Papa, A. (2017). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 374-388.
-          Werder, K. & Heckmann, C. S. (2019). Ambidexterity in information systems research: Overview of conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 20(1), 2.
-          Yadalhi F., Zare, H; and Hijazi, S. R. (2011). Identifying two-column components affecting commercialization performance of academic research, research and planning in higher education, 18(1), 69-90. (In Persian).
-          Zeng, D. Hu, J. & Ouyang, T. (2017). Managing innovation paradox in the sustainable innovation ecosystem: A case study of ambidextrous capability in a focal firm. Sustainability, 9(11), 2091.
دوره 28، شماره 113
بهار 1403
صفحه 106-134

  • تاریخ دریافت 01 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 15 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 26 اسفند 1402